This table displays the selected game’s current values on four BGG outcomes (UsersRated, Average, GeekRating, Weight) along with my predictive model(s) estimated values for where these games are likely to end up.
Published | ID | Name | Type | UserRatings | Average | GeekRating | Weight |
2022 | Current | 38 | 7.22 | 5.53 | 2.67 | ||
Estimated | 400 | 7.72 | 5.90 | 2.75 |
To see more information about the game on boardgamegeek, click on the game’s ID or Name to go straight to the game’s profile page.
Description |
In A Battle Through History, each player wears the clothes of a time-traveling storyteller whose journey through historical eras enables them to relive epic battles alongside legendary troops and heroes. During a game, players play era tiles into the "Gear of History" to customize their deck of cards and move their character in space and time in order to fight and recruit troops from different historical battles or challenge opponents in player vs. player combat. As you build an army made of soldiers from different ages, you use it to collect relics from different places and times. Whoever collects the greatest units and the bravest heroes, leads them to victory, and gathers relics during their travels wins the game. |
Information on the game’s designers, artists, families, mechanics and categories from BGG.
Published | ID | Name | Publisher(s) | Designer(s) | Artist(s) | Categories | Families | Mechanics |
2022 | Pegasus Spiele | Erik Burigo | Alan D'Amico | Card Game | Music: Music Groups | Deck, Bag, and Pool Building | ||
Scribabs | Pär Sundström | Peter Sallai | Fantasy | Theme: Music Making & Makers | Dice Rolling | |||
Marco Valtriani | Mirco Pierfederici | Fighting | Theme: Time Travel | Set Collection | ||||
Sebastian Łydżba | Science Fiction | |||||||
Wargame | ||||||||
For the full profile of the selected game, click on the links in the table or go to https://boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/349042
For each of the predictions above, I used models that were trained on historical boardgamegeek data in order to predict the selected game. How did the model(s) arrive at their predictions? The following plot displays Shapley values to indicate what features were most influential for the model’s predictions. Anything in blue increased the model’s predictions, anything in red decreased the model’s predictions.
What games are similar to A Battle Through History? I compare the selected game to every other game on boardgamegeek based on its mechanics, playing time, complexity, and game type. The tables below display the games which had the most similar data to A Battle Through History. The reported similarity is the cosine similarity between the selected game and all other games published before 2021.
This similarity score ranges from -1 to 1, where similarity of 1 indicates that games are exactly identical (a game will have a score of 1 with itself).
Note: This analysis does not look at a game’s ratings on BGG, publisher, artist, or designer - it focuses on finding similar games based on how they play, not how they are rated or by their theme.
The table below displays games with the most similar data to A Battle Through History. Click on a game’s ID or Name to go straight to its profile on boardgamegeek.
Rank | Published | ID | Name | Similarity | GeekRating | Average | Weight | UserRatings |
-- | 2022 | 1.00 | 5.53 | 7.22 | 2.75 | 38 | ||
1 | 1990 | 0.90 | 5.68 | 6.44 | 2.35 | 438 | ||
2 | 2011 | 0.86 | 7.09 | 7.38 | 2.33 | 10,810 | ||
3 | 2016 | 0.84 | 5.76 | 7.65 | 2.14 | 261 | ||
4 | 2011 | 0.84 | 6.67 | 7.18 | 2.90 | 4,107 | ||
5 | 2012 | 0.83 | 5.44 | 4.64 | 2.92 | 87 | ||
6 | 2016 | 0.82 | 5.87 | 7.15 | 2.80 | 591 | ||
7 | 2017 | 0.81 | 6.00 | 6.51 | 3.60 | 1,886 | ||
8 | 2017 | 0.80 | 6.26 | 7.42 | 3.16 | 1,207 | ||
9 | 2015 | 0.80 | 5.52 | 6.61 | 2.33 | 39 | ||
10 | 2017 | 0.80 | 5.64 | 7.49 | 3.29 | 171 | ||
11 | 2018 | 0.80 | 5.51 | 6.20 | 3.00 | 43 | ||
12 | 2014 | 0.79 | 5.53 | 6.40 | 3.00 | 68 | ||
13 | 2010 | 0.79 | 6.60 | 6.96 | 2.32 | 6,559 | ||
14 | 2013 | 0.78 | 5.53 | 6.54 | 3.00 | 78 | ||
15 | 2018 | 0.78 | 6.18 | 7.25 | 3.35 | 1,242 | ||
16 | 2016 | 0.78 | 6.18 | 7.25 | 3.14 | 1,140 | ||
17 | 2019 | 0.77 | 5.62 | 6.26 | 3.92 | 363 | ||
18 | 2012 | 0.77 | 6.17 | 7.21 | 2.71 | 1,224 | ||
19 | 2016 | 0.77 | 5.63 | 6.80 | 2.50 | 233 | ||
20 | 2012 | 0.76 | 5.48 | 5.44 | 3.00 | 152 | ||
21 | 2020 | 0.75 | 5.86 | 7.64 | 3.25 | 411 | ||
22 | 2017 | 0.75 | 6.30 | 7.09 | 3.12 | 1,795 | ||
23 | 2015 | 0.75 | 5.53 | 7.29 | 1.83 | 35 | ||
24 | 2013 | 0.75 | 6.31 | 7.18 | 3.24 | 1,660 | ||
25 | 2017 | 0.75 | 5.71 | 7.02 | 2.20 | 346 |
Click on the ID or Name for any game to go its profile page on boardgamegeek.
What games are similar to A Battle Through History while also being highly rated by the boardgamegeek community? In this table I multiply every neighboring game’s similarity score by its GeekRating. The resulting score is an attempt to balance these two quantities.
Rank | Published | ID | Name | Score | Similarity | GeekRating | Average | Weight | UserRatings |
-- | 2022 | 5.53 | 1.00 | 5.53 | 7.22 | 2.75 | 38 | ||
1 | 2011 | 6.11 | 0.86 | 7.09 | 7.38 | 2.33 | 10,810 | ||
2 | 2011 | 5.57 | 0.84 | 6.67 | 7.18 | 2.90 | 4,107 | ||
3 | 2010 | 5.22 | 0.79 | 6.60 | 6.96 | 2.32 | 6,559 | ||
4 | 2013 | 5.15 | 0.71 | 7.21 | 7.59 | 3.09 | 8,172 | ||
5 | 1990 | 5.10 | 0.90 | 5.68 | 6.44 | 2.35 | 438 | ||
6 | 2017 | 5.04 | 0.80 | 6.26 | 7.42 | 3.16 | 1,207 | ||
7 | 2015 | 4.93 | 0.73 | 6.78 | 7.30 | 2.90 | 5,524 | ||
8 | 2017 | 4.87 | 0.81 | 6.00 | 6.51 | 3.60 | 1,886 | ||
9 | 2019 | 4.86 | 0.67 | 7.24 | 7.61 | 2.70 | 9,530 | ||
10 | 2016 | 4.85 | 0.84 | 5.76 | 7.65 | 2.14 | 261 | ||
11 | 2018 | 4.80 | 0.78 | 6.18 | 7.25 | 3.35 | 1,242 | ||
12 | 2016 | 4.80 | 0.78 | 6.18 | 7.25 | 3.14 | 1,140 | ||
13 | 2016 | 4.79 | 0.82 | 5.87 | 7.15 | 2.80 | 591 | ||
14 | 2012 | 4.75 | 0.77 | 6.17 | 7.21 | 2.71 | 1,224 | ||
15 | 2017 | 4.73 | 0.75 | 6.30 | 7.09 | 3.12 | 1,795 | ||
16 | 2013 | 4.72 | 0.75 | 6.31 | 7.18 | 3.24 | 1,660 | ||
17 | 2019 | 4.65 | 0.74 | 6.29 | 7.15 | 2.44 | 1,760 | ||
18 | 1996 | 4.58 | 0.70 | 6.52 | 6.71 | 2.45 | 13,462 | ||
19 | 2011 | 4.53 | 0.69 | 6.56 | 6.75 | 1.97 | 13,474 | ||
20 | 2017 | 4.50 | 0.80 | 5.64 | 7.49 | 3.29 | 171 | ||
21 | 2012 | 4.50 | 0.83 | 5.44 | 4.64 | 2.92 | 87 | ||
22 | 2020 | 4.49 | 0.71 | 6.31 | 7.93 | 2.46 | 1,139 | ||
23 | 2012 | 4.48 | 0.72 | 6.18 | 6.72 | 2.70 | 2,177 | ||
24 | 2018 | 4.46 | 0.73 | 6.15 | 7.12 | 2.41 | 1,248 | ||
25 | 2015 | 4.43 | 0.80 | 5.52 | 6.61 | 2.33 | 39 |
I first ran a dimension reduction method (PCA) to identify the main points of variation for games on BGG. The first 25 components explained roughly 50% of the overall variation in the dataset, so I computed the cosine similarity between every game’s score on these 25 components.
The following plot shows every game on BGG plotted on the first two principal components of variation. I then highlight where the selected game and its nearest neighbors fall on these first two components.
Similarity scores are based on 25 principal components - the next table displays the selected game and its neighbors profiles on each of these components.
What are these components? The following plot shows which features contribute the most to each component.